OrthoMetiQHandoutDownload
Menu
🇬🇧 EN
🇩🇪 Deutsch🇬🇧 English
Clinical planning knowledge

Knee Planning Software for TKA, Alignment and Tibial Slope

Digital knee planning for mechanical-axis analysis, component sizing, resection logic and separate frontal and sagittal assessment.

More than 19 years of practical templating experienceExpert-led · browser-based · clinically structured
Practical definition

What professional planning software should actually do

Knee planning requires projection-specific reasoning. A short AP knee image can support component templating, while mechanical-axis planning requires a standardized long-leg image and tibial slope requires a reliable lateral projection. These questions should not be mixed into one generic measurement workflow.

OrthoMetiQ separates frontal TKA planning and lateral tibial-slope assessment so that measurements remain connected to the projection that actually supports them.

Questions the workflow must answer

  • Which image answers component sizing and which answers alignment?
  • Are hip, knee and ankle visible for mechanical-axis analysis?
  • Which femoral and tibial references define the planned resections?
  • Is component size compatible with bone width and overhang?
  • Is sagittal slope assessed on a true lateral projection?

A traceable planning workflow

  1. 01

    Image set review

    Separate AP knee, long-leg and lateral data according to their intended planning purpose.

  2. 02

    Axis landmarks

    Identify hip center, knee center and ankle center on a standardized weight-bearing image.

  3. 03

    Resection references

    Define distal femoral and proximal tibial planning references before selecting components.

  4. 04

    Component templating

    Assess width, position, coverage and the relationship to planned resections.

  5. 05

    Sagittal review

    Use a dedicated lateral workflow for tibial slope instead of projecting frontal assumptions into the sagittal plane.

  6. 06

    Report

    Document axes, planned components, resections and any image limitations.

Useful planning outputs

  • Mechanical-axis assessment
  • Femoral and tibial component estimates
  • Resection planning values
  • Tibial slope measurement
  • TKA planning report

Typical quality limits

  • Long-leg image without complete hip or ankle
  • Non-weight-bearing acquisition for a load-axis question
  • Rotation that distorts condylar or plateau width
  • Mixing short-image and long-leg scale assumptions
  • Treating templated size as final without intraoperative verification
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which image is used for alignment analysis?

Mechanical-axis analysis generally requires a standardized weight-bearing long-leg radiograph showing the hip center, knee and ankle.

What is tibial slope?

Tibial slope is the sagittal inclination of the tibial plateau and is assessed on a suitable lateral radiograph.

Which values matter in TKA planning?

Depending on the workflow: mechanical alignment, resection levels, component width, overhang, position, rotation reference and anticipated implant size.

Why assess AP and lateral views separately?

Frontal and sagittal planes answer different planning questions. Clear separation prevents measurements or projections from being mixed.

Experience behind OrthoMetiQ

Bastian Pesl

Founder of OrthoMetiQ and specialist in digital preoperative planning workflows, implant templating and orthopedic software. The content is based on nearly two decades of direct professional experience with planning systems, implant libraries and clinical users.

About expertise and methodology
OrthoMetiQ WebPlanner

Turn clinical planning questions into a structured digital workflow

Request an account to evaluate the browser-based WebPlanner for your own orthopedic workflow and implant requirements.

Request access